Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Samantha Power on a Complicated Hero


“If you want to see the change, you have to become the change.” Samantha Powers begins her TED talk by sharing a story about a conversation between Pat Schroeder, a CO congresswoman, and a journalist discussing the genocide happening in Rwanda and why U.S. Congress isn’t doing something to stop it.  Schroeder said that Congress is receiving more calls on the extinction of the mountain gorilla.  Why?  I think people care, or at least call and voice their concerns, about animals more than people because animals don’t have a voice of their own and people do. This reminds me of our discussion about A Whole New Mind; humans have empathy, meaning being able to feel for others.  Humans also easily feel sympathetic for animals. There is so much happening in our country, why should I get involved in affairs of another country?  
Powers goes on to share the life of Sergio Vieira de Mello, a U.N. diplomat who wants to help the people living in un-supported places around the world, such as places where genocide would be primary targets. Government are usually stronger than the people and even though the people want to fight back, they do not have the numbers. Examples include dictatorships in places like China and Egypt(before the president stepped down). The people do not have a say or cannot make change to the dictators' laws. Sergio started to get involved and began movements in Africa to make changes and help the people living there by giving them food and shelter.  
“If you want to see the change, you have to become the change.” I think this means that in order to make change, you have to understand why it needs to happen and how you can participate in making it happen. I admire Sergio’s motivation for his cause because he really understood the change. I wonder how someone could be so motivated for a cause, even though he appears to receive no benefit from it. In class and throughout Dan Pink's books, we explored intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and rewards. Sergio put his own life at risk, so that he could have intrinsic rewards instead of extrinsic ones. People like these are the true heros in America. The people who want to make a difference in order to help others are the true heros. I wonder if he had been doing it for the extrinsic reward (being called a hero) whether he would have accomplished as much. If the reward is the happiness of others, then I think it should be encouraged. If you help others for the feeling you have inside, then that is an intrinsic reward. To me, this is the best reward possible. I relate this to myself because I want to make a change in people’s understanding of others. I dislike judgment; however, it is a part of every person. It is a proven fact that all people judge because they cannot put that feeling aside. When I think of the fact that people are so judgmental, I feel sometimes like I can’t change this, and I feel sad. I know that if I want to help make changes I have to understand why people make judgments. Powers ends her TED talk with the four lessons she learned because of Sergio’s accomplishments - a relationship to evil, a respect for dignity, understanding freedom from fear, and an awareness of the world around you. I understood her TED talk as, change can only happen if you make it happen.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Dave Eggers Wish

Dave Eggers gave his speech very well. Even though he was nervous, his voice was inspirational and his story was funny. He believed that kids need more one-on-one time with teachers or adults in order for their school work to improve. I wonder why kids do better if they have more one-on-one time. I think this is because kids need more attention and not everyone speaks up in class. Some kids are either too nervous or afraid to ask questions to the teacher even though that is what they need. For example, sometimes I don't speak up about a topic during class because I want to ask the teacher myself. This is good for me if the teacher can find time to meet; however, the class could have benefited from my question. With this idea of one-on-one time, Dave Eggers and a few of his friends started a tutoring business for kids after school. Eventually, the kids started publishing books and selling them. Dave said that the kids wanted to learn and were more focused if they were going to finish homework before they got home. I think this is because kids were not distracted and could easily get the help they needed. So, if this is a fact, why don't our education systems allow more one on-one-time with teachers? Class sizes are very big and some teachers see about 100 kids a day. We could reduce class size; however, then not as many kids would be able to attend the school. How would we choose who got to attend school? We could also try making class length shorter and giving kids more off hours. This would limit the amount of work actually done and kids would probably get more homework. I think that it is the kids' responsibility to talk to their teachers and get the help they need. Some younger kids don't understand this which is why tutor centers are very important. One-on-one time is very important and should be encouraged, but school systems should not be changed in order to accommodate it.